Vol. 8 (2023)
Artículos

Metodología doctrinal en el derecho administrativo de la UE: reaccionar frente a la “impronta estatal”

PDF HTML
  • Filipe Brito Bastos
Filipe Brito Bastos
Professor Auxiliar, NOVA School of Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/RDP/vol_8_2023_1953

Publicado 2023-10-06

Palabras clave

  • derecho administrativo de la UE,
  • doctrina jurídica,
  • metodología,
  • paradoja de la entidad política europea (paradox of the European polity),
  • impronta estatal (touch of Stateness),
  • interdisciplinariedad
    • ...Más
    Menos

Cómo citar

Brito Bastos, F. (2023). Metodología doctrinal en el derecho administrativo de la UE: reaccionar frente a la “impronta estatal”. Revista De Derecho Público: Teoría Y método, 8, 7–69. https://doi.org/10.37417/RDP/vol_8_2023_1953

Derechos de autor 2023 Filipe Brito Bastos

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor en la publicación y sólo autorizan a la editorial Marcial Pons los derechos no exclusivos de la publicación y distribución de los artículos

Resumen

Desde su origen, el estudio académico del derecho administrativo de la UE se ha basado en gran medida en categorías, conceptos y principios doctrinales procedentes del derecho administrativo de los Estados miembros. Ese estudio ha optado preferentemente por programas de investigación como la europeización del derecho administrativo nacional o el desarrollo de principios europeos comunes derivados de los ordenamientos administrativos internos. Asimismo, la doctrina ha adoptado una postura crítica frente al derecho administrativo de la UE cuando no se ajusta a los criterios y estándares normativos que normalmente rigen el derecho administrativo nacional. Pese a su relevancia, estos programas de investigación reproducen de forma particularmente clara una paradoja que nos resulta familiar. Aunque a estas alturas nadie puede cuestionar seriamente la existencia de una administración europea y de un derecho administrativo europeo más allá del marco estatal, la doctrina tiende a analizarlos —implícita o explícitamente— desde la perspectiva jurídica del Estado-nación. Esta “impronta estatal” (touch of Stateness) ha condicionado el derecho administrativo de la UE a pesar de que este último presenta ciertas peculiaridades sin precedentes en los ordenamientos nacionales. Este artículo explora y propone un enfoque metodológico para responder a las preconcepciones y expectativas normativas procedentes del derecho nacional y que han condicionado —hasta el punto de impedir— un desarrollo doctrinal más profundo del derecho administrativo de la UE.

PDF HTML

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. ABOTT, Kenneth, LEVI-FAUR, David y SNIDAL, Duncan, “Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, núm. 14, 2017, pp. 670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272
  2. ARROYO JIMENEZ, Luis “Sistème et Sistèmatisation du Droit Administratif Européen”, 3 Preprint Series of the Center for European Studies Luis Ortega Álvarez and the Jean Monnet Chair of European Administrative Law in Glbal Perspective, 2019, pp. 9-10
  3. ARZOZ SANTISTEBAN, Xavier, “El Acto Administrativo en el Derecho de la Unión Europea”, Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea, núm. 19, 2019, pp. 71
  4. AUBY, Jean-Bernard, “About Europeanization of Domestic Judicial Review”, Review of European Administrative Law, núm. 7, 2014, p. 19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7590/187479814X14186465137906
  5. AZOULAI, Loïc, “The Europeanisation of Legal Concepts”, en Ulla Neergard y Ruth Nielsen, European Legal Method: in a Multi-Layered EU Legal Order, DJOF, 2012, pp. 165
  6. BACH, Tobias y RUFFING, Eva, “The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-level System”, en Edoardo Ongaro y Sandra van Thiel, The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and management in Europe, Palgrave, 2018, pp. 747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_39
  7. BACHOF, Otto, „Die Dogmatik des Verwaltungsrechts vor den Gegenwartsaufgaben der Verwaltung“, Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, núm. 30, 1972, pp. 194, p. 236
  8. BARENTS, René, The Autonomy of Community Law, Wolters Kluwer, 2004
  9. BENGOETXEA, Joxerramón, The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice, Oxford University Press, 1993
  10. BOBEK, Michal, “Why There is No Principle of “Procedural Autonomy” of the Member States”, en Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz y Bruno de Witte, The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States, Intersentia, 2011, pp. 305
  11. BRITO BASTOS, Filipe, “The Borelli Doctrine Revisited: Three Issues of Coherence in a Landmark Ruling for EU Administrative Justice”, Review of European Administrative Law, núm. 8, 2015, pp. 269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7590/187479815X14465419060622
  12. CARANTA, Roberto, “Coordinamento e Divisione dei Compiti tra Corte di Giustizia Delle Comunità Ruropee e Giudizi Nazionali Nelle Ipotesi di Coamministrazione: il Caso Dei Prodotti Modificati Geneticamente”, en Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2000, pp. 1133
  13. CARANTA, Roberto, “Judicial Protection Against Member States: A New Jus Commune Takes Shape”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 32, 1995, pp. 703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA1995032
  14. CARANTA, Roberto, “Sull’impugnabilità Degli atti Endoprocedimentali Adottati Dalle Autorità Nazionali Nelle Ipotesi di Coamministrazione”, en Foro Amministrativo , 1994, pp. 752
  15. CAROLAN, Eoin y CURTIN, Deirdre, “In Search of a New Model of Checks and Balances for the EU: Beyond Separation of Powers”, en Joana Mendes y Ingo Venzke, Allocating Authority: who should do what in European and International Law, Hart, 2018, pp. 53
  16. CASINI, Lorenzo, CASSESE, Sabino, y NAPOLITANO, Giulio, “The New Italian Public Law Scholarship”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, núm. 9, 2011, pp. 301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor049
  17. CASSATELLA, Antonio, “Il dovere di motivazione nello jus commune europeo”, en Giacinto della Cananea y Martina Conticelli, I Procedimenti Amministrativi di Adjudication dell’Unione Europea: Principi Generali e Discipline Settoriali, Giappichelli, 2017, pp. 17
  18. CASSESE, Sabino, Diritto Amministrativo: Storia e Prospettive, Il Mulino, 2010
  19. CASSESE, Sabino, “European Administrative Proceedings”, Law & Contemporary Problems, núm. 68, 2005, pp. 2
  20. CASSESE, Sabino, “L’Unione europea e il guinzaglio tedesco”, Giornale di Diritto Amministrativo, 2009, pp. 1003
  21. CASSESE, Sabino, “La Signoria Comunitaria del Diritto Amministrativo”, Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2002, p. 291
  22. CASSESE, Sabino, “New Paths for Administrative Law”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, núm 10, 2012, p 603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos038
  23. CHAMON, Merijn, EU Agencies: Legal and Political Limits to the Transformation of the EU Administration, Oxford University Press, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784487.001.0001
  24. CHITI, Edoardo, “The Administrative Implementation of European Union Law: A Taxonomy and Its Implications”, en Herwig Hofmann y Alexander Türk, Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449206.00007
  25. CHITI, Edoardo, “The Relationship Between National Administrative Law and European Administrative Law in Administrative Procedures”, en Jacques Ziller, What’s New in European Administrative Law/ Quoi de Neuf en Droit Administratif Européen, 2005
  26. CHITI, Edoardo, Le Agenzie Europee. Unità e Decentramento nelle Amministrazioni Comunitari, Cedam, 2002
  27. CHITI, Edoardo, The Governance of Compliance, en COMPLIANCE AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF EU LAW 31, 36 (Marise Cremona ed., 2012) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644735.003.0002
  28. CHITI, Mario, “I procedimenti composti nel diritto comunitario e nel diritto interno”, en Quaterni del Consiglio di Stato: Attività Amministrativa e Tutela degli Interessati. L’Influenza del Diritto Comunitario, 1997, pp. 55
  29. CHITI, Mario, “La peculiarità dell’invalidità amministrativa per anticomunitarietà”, en Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2008, pp. 477
  30. CIANFEROTTI, Giulio, Il Pensiero di V. E. Orlando e la Giuspubblicistica Italiana fra Ottocento e Novecento, Giuffrè, 1980, p. 99; Sabino CASSESE, Cultura e Politica del Diritto Amministrativo, Il Mulino, 1972, pp. 21–25
  31. COCCO, Giovanni, “Incompatibilità comunitaria degli atti amministrativi: Coordinate teoriche ed applicazioni pratiche”, en Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2001, pp. 447
  32. COLOMBO, Carlo Maria y ELIANTONIO, Mariolina, „The Changing Nature of the Public Administration: Innovations and Challenges for Public Lawyers“, European Public Law, núm. 24, 2018, pp. 403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2018023
  33. CRAIG, Paul, EU Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, 2.ª ed., 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568628.001.0001
  34. CRAIG, Paul, EU Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, 3.ª ed., 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831655.001.0001
  35. CRAIG, Paul, UK, EU, and Global Administrative Law: Foundations and Challenges, Oxford University Press, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316408865
  36. CURTIN, Deirdre, Executive Power in the European Union: Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution, Oxford University Press, 2009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264087.001.0001
  37. de la SIERRA, Susana, Tutela Cautelar Contencioso-Administrativa y Derecho Europeo: Un Estudio Normativo y Jurisprudencial, Aranzadi 2004
  38. de LUCIA, Luca, Amministrazione Transnazionale e Ordinamento Europeo. Saggio sul Pluralismo Amministrativo, Giappichelli, 2009
  39. de WALL, Heinrich, Die Anwendbarkeit privatrechtlicher Vorschriften im Verwaltungsrecht, Mohr Siebeck, 1999
  40. de WITTE, Bruno, “European Union Law: A Unified Academic Discipline?”, en Antoine Vauchez y Bruno de Witte, Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Transnational Social Field, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 101
  41. de WITTE, Bruno, “The Relative Autonomy of the European Union’s Fundamental Rights Regime”, Nordic Journal of International Law, núm. 1, 2019, pp. 65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08810004
  42. della CANANEA, Giacinto y BUSSANI, Mauro “The ‘Common Core’ of Administrative Laws in Europe: A Framework for Analysis”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, núm. 26, 2019, pp. 217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19827817
  43. della CANANEA, Giacinto y FRANCHINI, Claudio, I Principi dell’Amministrazione Europea, Giappichelli, 2017
  44. della CANANEA, Giacinto, “Ius Publicum Europeaeum: Divergent National Traditions or Common Legal Patrimony”, en Matthias Ruffert, Administrative Law in Europe: Between Common Principles and National Traditions, Europa Law Publishings, 2013, pp. 125
  45. della CANANEA, “The European Union’s Mixed Administrative Proceedings”, Law and Contemporary Problems, núm. 68, 2005, pp. 197
  46. DONNER, Andreas, “National Law and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 1, 1963, pp. 8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA1963003
  47. DONNER, Andreas, The Role of the Lawyer in the European Communities, Edinburgh University Press, 1968
  48. DOUGAN, Michael, National Remedies Before the Court of Justice: Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation, Hart, 2004
  49. EIFERT, Martin, „Das Verwaltungsrecht zwischen klassischem dogmatischen Verständnis und Steuerungswissenschaftlichem Anspruch“, Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, núm. 67, 2008, pp. 288
  50. ELIANTONIO, Mariolina, “Judicial Review in an Integrated Administration: The Case of ‘Composite Procedures’”, Review of European Administrative Law, núm. 7, 2014, pp. 65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7590/187479814X14186465138022
  51. ELIANTONIO, Mariolina, Europeanisation of Administrative Justice?: The Influence of the ECJ’s Case Law in Italy, Germany and England, Europa Law Publishing, 2009
  52. FISH, Stanley, Is there a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Harvard University Press, 1980
  53. FRANCHINI, Claudio, “I Principi Applicabili ai Procedimenti Amministrativi Europei”, en Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2003, pp. 1037
  54. GAJA, Giorgio, “Case C-6/99, Association Greenpeace France and Others v. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche and Others”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 37, 2000, pp. 1427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/315872
  55. GALETTA, Diana-Urania, Procedural Autonomy of EU Member States: Paradise Lost?, Springer, 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12547-8
  56. GARRIDO-FALLA, Fernando, “Sobre el Derecho Administrativo y sus Ideas Cardinales”, Revista de Administración Pública, núm. 7, p. 11
  57. GIANNINI, Massimo Severo, “Profili di un diritto amministrativo delle Comunità europee”, en Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, 2003, p. 979
  58. GRECO, Guido, “Inoppugnabilità e disapplicazione dell’atto amministrativo nel quadro comunitario e nazionale”, en Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario, 2006, pp. 513
  59. HARLOW, Carol y RAWLINGS, Richard, Law and Administration, Cambridge University Press, 3.ª ed., 2009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809941
  60. HATJE, Armin y MANKOWSKI, Peter, „Nationale Unionsrechte: Sprachgrenzen, Traditionsgrenzen, Systemgrenzen, Denkgrenzen“, Europarecht, núm 49, 2014, 155.
  61. HAURIOU, Maurice, Principes de Droit Public, 2.ª ed., Silbey, 1916
  62. HOFMANN, Herwig y TIDGHI, Morgane, “Rights and Remedies in Implementation of EU Policies by Multi-Jurisdictional Networks”, European Public Law, núm. 20, 2014, pp. 147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2014011
  63. HOFMANN, Herwig, “Composite Decision Making Procedures in EU Administrative Law”, en Herwig Hofmann y Alexander Türk, Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: towards an Integrated Administration, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 136
  64. HOFMANN, Herwig, “Composite Decision Making Procedures in EU Administrative Law”, en Herwig Hofmann y Alexander Türk, Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449206.00013
  65. HOFMANN, Herwig, “The Right to an ‘Effective Judicial Remedy’ and the Changing Conditions of Implementing EU Law”, Univ. Luxembourg – Law Working Paper 2013-2, 17 (2013) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2292542
  66. HOFMANN, Herwig, ROWE, Gerard y TÜRK, Alexander, “A Conceptual Understanding of EU Sectoral Administrative Law”, en Herwig HOFMANN, Gerard ROWE y Alexander TÜRK, Specialized Administrative Law of the European Union, Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787433.003.0001
  67. HOFMANN, Herwig, ROWE, Gerard y TÜRK, Alexander, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union, Oxford University Press, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286485.001.0001
  68. JANS, Jan, PRECHAL, Sacha WIDDERSHOVEN, Rob (Eds.), Europeanisation of Public Law, 2.ª ed., Europa Law Publishing, 2015
  69. JANSEN, Nils, Making Doctrine for European Law, en en Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz y Edward Rubin, Rethinking Legal Scholarship: a Transatlantic Dialogue, Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.007
  70. KADELBACH, Stefan, Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht unter europäischem Einfluß, Mohr Siebeck, 1999
  71. KADELBACH, Stefan, European Administrative Law and the Law of a Europeanized Administration, en Christian Joerges y Renaud Dehousse, Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0006
  72. KAHL, Wolfgang, “What Is ‘New’ about the ‘New Administrative Law Science’ in Germany?”, European Public Law, núm. 16, 2010, pp. 105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2010006
  73. KINGSBURY, Benedict, KRISCH, Nico y STEWART, Richard, “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law”, Law & Contemporary Problems, núm. 68, 2005, pp. 15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.692628
  74. KLECATSKY, Hans, “Reflections on the Rule of Law and in Particular the Principle of Legality of Administrative Action”, International Commission of Jurists, núm. 4, 1963, pp. 205
  75. KOOPMANS, Thymen, „Jürgen SCHWARZE, European Administrative Law. London and Luxemburg: Sweet & Maxwell and Office for Publications of the EC, 1992. CV and 1547 pages (Book Review)“, Common Market Law Review, núm. 31, 1994, pp. 193
  76. KRANENBURG, Roelof, Inleiding in het Nederlandsch Administratief Recht: Algemeen Deel, Tjeenk Willink, 1941
  77. LANGROD, Georges, „France“, en Erk Volkmar Heyen, Geschichte der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft in Europa, Klostermann, 1982, pp. 67
  78. LE SUEUR, Andrew, “‘Tradition’ in English Administrative Law”, en Matthias Ruffert, Administrative Law in Europe: between Common Principles and National Traditions, Europa Law Publishings, 2013, pp. 19
  79. LENAERTS, Koen, “The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 44, 2007, pp. 1625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2007138
  80. de LUCIA, Luca, “Conflict and Cooperation within European Composite Administration (Between Philia and Eris)”, Review of European Administrative Law, núm. 5, 2012, pp. 49
  81. LUPO, Nicola y PICCIRILI, Giovanni, “The Relocation of the Legality Principle by the European Courts’ Case Law: An Italian Perspective”, European Constitutional Law Review, núm. 11, 2015, pp. 67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961500005X
  82. MARTÍN-RETORTILLO BAQUER, Sebastián, El Derecho Civil en la Génesis del Derecho Administrativo y de sus Instituciones, Civitas, 1960
  83. MARZAL, Toni, “From Hercules to Pareto: Of Bathos, Proportionality, and EU Law”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, núm. 15, 2017, pp. 621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox055
  84. MARZAL, Toni, Is the BVerfG PSPP Decision “Simply not Comprehensible”?, Verfassungsblog, 9 de mayo de 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/is-the-bverfg-pspp-decision-simply-not-comprehensible/
  85. MAUTNER, Menachem, “Three Approaches to Law and Culture”, Cornell Law Review, núm. 96, 2011, pp. 839.
  86. MAYER, Otto, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, I, Duncker & Humblot, 1895
  87. MENDES, Joana, Participation in EU Rule-Making: a Rights-Based Approach, Oxford University Press, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599769.001.0001
  88. MICKLITZ, Hans y RUBIN, Edward Rethinking Legal Scholarship: a Transatlantic Dialogue, Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 207, p. 210
  89. MIRANDA, João, “Em Defesa da Inconstitucionalidade do Recurso Hierárquico Necessário”, Cadernos de Justiça Administrativa, núm. 9, 1998, pp. 39
  90. MÖLLERS, Christophe, „Methoden“, en Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann y Andreas Voßkuhle, Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, I, 2ª ed., C. H. Beck, 2012, pp. 123
  91. MOTA ALMEIDA, Luís Filipe, “Nótulas Sobre o Conceito de Acto Administrativo da União Europeia”, e-Pública, núm. 4, 2018, pp. 96
  92. NEHL, Hanns Peter, Europäisches Verwaltungsverfahren und Gemeinschaftsverfassung: Eine Studie gemeinschaftsrechtlicher Verfahrensgrundsätze unter besonderer Berücksichtigung »mehrstufiger« Verwaltungsverfahren, Duncker & Humblot, 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-50576-0
  93. NEHL, Hanns Peter, Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law, Hart, 1999
  94. NEIDHARDT, Stephan, Nationale Rechtsinstitute als Bausteine europäischen Verwaltungsrechts, Mohr Siebeck, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151164-6
  95. NEWCOMB HOHFELD, Wesley, “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning”, Yale Law Journal, núm. 23, 1913, pp. 16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/785533
  96. NOLTE, Georg, “General Principles of German and European Administrative Law: A Historical Perspective”, Modern Law Review, núm. 57, 1994, pp. 191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01932.x
  97. PECZENIK, Aleksander, “A Theory of Legal Doctrine”, Ratio Juris, núm. 14, 2001, pp. 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00173
  98. PEREIRA DA SILVA, Vasco, Em Busca do Acto Administrativo Perdido, Almedina, 2003
  99. POIARES MADURO, Miguel, We the Court, Hart, 1999
  100. RÖHL, Hans-Christian, “Procedures in the European Composite Administration”, en Javier Barnes, Transforming Administrative Procedure, Global Law Press, 2008, pp. 77
  101. RÖHL, Hans-Christian, Die Anfechtbare Entscheidung nach Art. 230 Abs. 4 EGV, en Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann y Bettina Schöndorf-Haubold, Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund, C. H. Beck, 2005, pp. 309
  102. ROMANO, Santi, Principii di Diritto Amministrativo Italiano, Libraria, 1906
  103. RUFFERT, Matthias, „The Transformation of Administrative Law as a Transnational Methodological Project“, en Matthias RUFFERT, The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe = La Mutation du Droit Administratif en Europe, Europa Law Publishings, 2007, pp. 3
  104. SANDULLI, Aldo, Il Ruolo della Scienza Giuridica nella Costruzione del Diritto Amministrativo Europeo, en Luca de Lucia y Barbara Marchetti, L’Amministrazione Europea e le sue Regole, Il Mulino, 2015, pp. 273
  105. SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard, “Cuestiones Fundamentales Sobre la Reforma de la Teoría General del Derecho Administrativo. Necesidad de la Innovación y Presupuestos Metodológicos”, en Javier Barnes, Innovación y Reforma en el Derecho Administrativo, Global Law Press, 2006, pp. 15
  106. SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard, “Introduction: European Composite Administration and the Role of European Administrative Law”, en Oswald Jansen y Bettina Schöndorf-Haubold, The European Composite Administration, Intersentia, 2011, pp. 1
  107. SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard, Verwaltungsrechtliche Dogmatik, Mohr Siebeck, 2013
  108. SCHOCH, Friedrich, „Zur Europäisierung des Verwaltungsrechts“, Juridica International, núm. 21, 2014, p. 102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2014.21.09
  109. SCHOLTEN, Miroslava, “Mind the Trend! Enforcement of EU Law has been Moving to ‘Brussels’”, Journal of European Public Policy, núm. 29, 2017, pp. 1348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314538
  110. SCHÜTZE, Robert, “From Rome to Lisbon: “Executive Federalism” in the (New) European Union”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 47, 2010, pp. 1385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010059
  111. SCHWARZE, Jürgen, “Die verordnete Demokratie”, Europarecht, 2010, pp. 108, 111-112. Cf. CASSESE, L’Unione europea e il guinzaglio tedesco, Giornale di Diritto Amministrativo, 2009, pp. 1003
  112. SCHWARZE, Jürgen, Europäisches Verwaltungsrecht: Entstehung und Entwicklung im Rahmen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Nomos, 1988
  113. SCHWARZE, Jürgen, European Administrative Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2006
  114. SHAW, Jo y WIENER, Antje, “The Paradox of the ‘European Polity’”, en Maria Green Cowles & Michael Smith, Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 64
  115. SIEMS, Matthias, “The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way out of the Desert”, Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, núm. 7, 2009, pp. 5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14760400903195090
  116. SIMONCINI, Marta, Administrative Regulation beyond the Non-Delegation Doctrine: a Study on EU Agencies, Hart, 2018, pp. 94
  117. SKOCZYLAS, Andrzej y SWORA, Mariusz, Administrative Remedies in Polish Administrative Law, en Dacian Dragos & Bogdana Neamtu, Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law, Springer, 2014, pp. 337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1_11
  118. SMITS, Jan, “What is Legal Doctrine? On the Aims and Methods of Legal-Dogmatic Research”, en Rob van Gestel,
  119. SNYDER, Francis, New Directions in European Community Law, Northwestern University Press, 1990
  120. STOLLEIS, Michael, Öffentliches Recht in Deutschland: eine Einführung in seine Geschichte, C. H. Beck, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406659447
  121. STOLLEIS, Michael,“Die Entstehung des Allgemeinen Teils des Verwaltungsrechts (1850–1900)”, Juridica International, núm. 21, 2014, pp. 21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2014.21.02
  122. THOMAS, Robert, Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law, Hart, 2000
  123. TRIDIMAS, Takis, The General Principles of EU Law, 2ª ed. 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199258062.001.0001
  124. TUORI, Kaarlo, Critical Legal Positivism, Routledge, 2002, pp. 300–03; Aulis AARNIO, Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law, Springer, 2011
  125. TUORI, Kaarlo, European Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091883
  126. TUORI, Kaarlo, Ratio and Voluntas, Ashgate, 2011
  127. HALTERN, Ulrich, “The Dawn of the Political: Rethinking the Meaning of Law in European Integration”, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Internationales und Europäisches Recht, núm. 5, 2004, 585
  128. van den BERGE, Lukas, “The Relational Turn in Dutch Administrative Law”, Utrecht Law Review, núm. 13, 2017, p. 99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.374
  129. van den BRINK, Herman, Niederlande, en Geschichte der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft in Europa, Erk Volkmar Heyen, 1982, pp. 117
  130. van GERVEN, Walter, “Bridging the Gap between Community and National Laws: Towards a Principle of Homogeneity in the Field of Legal Remedies?”, Common Market Law Review, núm. 32, 1995, pp. 679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA1995031
  131. VAUCHEZ, Antoine, Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity, Cambridge University Press, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107326323
  132. VENN DICEY, Albert, An Introduction to the Study of the Constitution, Macmillan, 1885 (reimpresión 1979) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17968-8
  133. VINCZE, Attila, Unionsrecht und Verwaltungsrecht: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zur Rezeption des Unionsrechts, Nomos, 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845279282
  134. von BOGDANDY, “National Legal Scholarship in the European Legal Area: A Manifesto”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, núm. 10, 2012, 614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos023
  135. von DANWITZ, Thomas, Europäisches Verwaltungsrecht, Springer, 2008, p. 141
  136. von der PFORDTEN, Dietmar, About Concepts in Law, en CONCEPTS IN LAW 17, 18–19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2982-9_2
  137. VOßKUHLE, Andreas, „Die Reform des Verwaltungsrechts als Projekt der Wissenschaft“, Die Verwaltung, núm. 32, 1999, pp. 545, p. 551.
  138. VOßKUHLE, Andreas, „Neue Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft“, en Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann y Andreas Voßkuhle, Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, I, 2ª ed., C. H. Beck, 2012, pp. 24.
  139. VOßKUHLE, Andreas,“Neue Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft“, en Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann y Andreas Voßkuhle, Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, I, 2ª ed., C. H. Beck, 2012, pp. 24
  140. WEILER, Joseph, en Joseph Weiler y Marlene Wind, European Constitutionalism beyond the State, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 7
  141. WERNER, Fritz, „Verwaltungsrecht als konkretisiertes Verfassungsrecht“, en Recht und Gericht unserer Zeit, 1971
  142. WIDDERSHOVEN, Rob y REMAC, Milan, “General Principles of Law in Administrative Law under European Influence”, European Review of Private Law, núm. 2, 2012, pp. 381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2012023
  143. WIDDERSHOVEN, Rob, “Developing Administrative Law in Europe: Natural Convergence or Imposed Uniformity?”, Review of European Administrative Law, núm. 7, 2014, p. 5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7590/187479814X14186465137861
  144. WIDDERSHOVEN, Rob, “European Administrative Law”, en René Seerden, Administrative Law of the European Union, its Member States and the United States, Intersentia, 2012, pp. 245
  145. WILHELM, Walter, Zur juristischen Methodenlehre im 19. Jahrhundert. Die Herkunft der Methode Paul Labands aus der Privatrechtswissenschaft, De Gruyter, 1958
  146. ZILLER, Jacques, «Introduction: Les Concepts D’administration Directe, D’administration Indirecte et de Co-Administration et les Fondements du droit Administrative Européen», en Jean-Bernard Auby y Jacqueline Dutheil de la Rochère, Droit Administratif Européen, Bruylant, 2007, pp. 235, pp. 241–43 (eds., 2007)

Update cookies preferences