No. 1 (2025): Small claims
Artículos

AI-Based Automation of the European Small Claims Procedure: Legal Framework Mapping

PDF HTML
  • Maria Dymitruk
Maria Dymitruk
University of Wrocław
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2911

Published 2025-05-06

Keywords

  • European Small Claims Procedure,
  • ESCP,
  • automation,
  • AI,
  • artificial intelligence

How to Cite

Dymitruk, M. (2025). AI-Based Automation of the European Small Claims Procedure: Legal Framework Mapping. Revista Ítalo-Española De Derecho Procesal, (1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2911

Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Dymitruk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper explores current legal regulations regarding AI-based automation (full or partial) of the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP). It analyzes European-level legislation, focusing on personal data protection (specifically Article 22 of the GDPR) and human rights (mainly Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights), while also mentioning the possibility of establishing a legal basis for ESCP automation in the national legal orders of EU Member States’ legal systems.

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Almada, M., & Dymitruk, M. (2022). Data protection and judicial automation. In Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 270-289.
  2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2018). Guidelines on Automated Individual Decision-Making and Profiling for the Purposes of Regulation 2016/679.
  3. Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET). (2018). Algorithms and Human Rights – Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques (in particular algorithms) and possible regulatory implications.
  4. Dymitruk, M. (2023). Wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji w post?powaniu cywilnym (doctoral dissertation). University of Wroc?aw.
  5. Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI magazine, 38(3), 50-57.
  6. Ko?ció?ek, A., & Banaszewska, A. (2016). Automatyzacja czynno?ci orzekania w europejskim post?powaniu nakazowym. E-Wymiar sprawiedliwo?ci w aspekcie europejskim, Pozna? 2016, 37-52.
  7. Malgieri, G. (2019). Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations. Computer law & security review, 35(5), 105327.
  8. Nekrošius, V. (2011). Post?powanie w sprawie europejskiego nakazu zap?aty, Aurea praxis, Aurea theoria: Ksi?ga Pami?tkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Ereci?skiego, Warszawa, LexisNexis, 1213-1231.
  9. Simaitis, R., V?brait?, V., & Markevi?i?t?, M. (2022). European Small Claims Procedure in the realm of the other European proceedings. Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal, (1), 123-136.
  10. Veersalu, K., & Hoffmann, T. (2023). Automation Within a Novel Platform for the European Small Claims Procedure. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(2), 152-176.
  11. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. International data privacy law, 7(2), 76-99.

Update cookies preferences