Núm. 1 (2025): Small claims
Artículos

Ex officio Application of EU Consumer Law in the Enforcement of the ESCP Judgments

Tatjana Josipovic
University of Zagreb

Publicado 2025-05-06

Palabras clave

  • European Small Claims Procedure,
  • EU consumer law,
  • ex officio application of EU law,
  • enforcement of ESCO judgements

Cómo citar

Josipovic, T. (2025). Ex officio Application of EU Consumer Law in the Enforcement of the ESCP Judgments. Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, (1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2912

Resumen

The main aim of the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) is to simplify citizens’ access to justice by accelerating adjudication in small value disputes in cross-border cases, decreasing the costs of the proceedings and simplifying the recognition and enforcement of  ESCP judgements rendered in another Member State. Therefore, the ESCP is organised as a summary  and formal procedure. In ESCP, national courts are bound to respect and promote fundamental rights and principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the right to a fair trial and the principle of an adversarial process. At the same time, it is particularly important that in the ESCP, the principle of effectiveness and effective judicial protection is respected. In their numerous judgments, the European Court of Justice, emphasises these very principles as being crucial for effective EU law enforcement, particularly in the context of consumer legal disputes where substantive and/or procedural law of the Union is applicable. The ECJ’s interpretation has often been that, because of effective protection of consumers, national courts must, under particular preconditions,  ex officio apply the consumer law of the EU. The ECJ has defined a whole series of procedural rules to be complied with when applying EU consumer law ex officio. However, a question arises whether, due to specific procedural rules governing the ESCP, it is possible that national courts, when enforcing  ESCP judgments, ex officio apply the EU consumer law. In the  article  various aspects of ex officio application of EU consumer law in the ESCP are considered, particularly in the context of the recent ECJ case law on ex officio application of EU consumer law in enforcement procedures. The main aim of the article  is to analyse specific measures by which the European standards of effective court protection of EU consumer rights in the ESCP enforcement procedures can be ensured.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Ancery, A. (2021) Consumer Credit Contracts and Ex Officio Application: A Dutch Perspective, Case Note on Profi Credit Polska (Cases C-419/18 and C-483/18), Journal of European Consumer and Market Law/EuCML, Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp 160-164.
  2. Beka, A. (2018), The Active Role of Courts in Consumer Litigation, Cambridge-Antwerp-Chicago, Intersentia.
  3. Davida, Z. (2024) Consumer Decision-Making Autonomy in the Digital Environment: Towards a New Understanding of National Courts’ Obligation to Assess Ex Officio Violations of Fair Commercial Practices, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 15, Special Issue 4, doi: 10.1017/err.2024.11, pp.1034-1049.
  4. Garber, Th. (2020) Kommentar EuGFVO (2020) in Geimer, R., Schütze, R.A. (Hrsg), Europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecht, München, 2020, 4. Aufl., C.H.Beck Verlag, pp 1301-1387.
  5. Giacalone, M., Sajedeh Salehi, S. (2020), European Small Claim Procedure: Implementation and Enforcement Revisited in Italy and Belgium, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law/EuCML/EuCML, Vol. 9, pp. 181-190.
  6. Giacalone, M., Sajedeh Salehi, S. (2022), Small Claims and the Pursuit of (Digital) Justice: a tiered online dispute resolution perspective , Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal (1), pp. 181-213.
  7. Józon,M. (2023) The ‘Ex Officio’ Doctrine of the CJEU Revisited: On the Active Role in Unfair Contract Terms Law-Critical Remarks on the Lintner Ruling (C-551/17), Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy/CYELP, Vol. 19, pp. 361-378.
  8. Kramer, X.E., (2008) The European Small Claims Procedure: Striking Balance between Simplicity and Fairness in European Litigation, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht/ZEuP (Heft 2), pp. 355-373.
  9. Law, S. (2018) The Transformation of Consumer Law in Times of Crisis: The Ex Officio Control of Unfair Contract Terms, in A. Uzelac, C.H. van Rhee (eds), Transformation of Civil Justice, Cham, Springer, pp 283-307.
  10. Lenearts, K., Mesalis, I., Gutman, K. (2015), EU Procedural Law, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.
  11. Schlosser, P.F. (2021) Kommentar Eu GFVO in Schlosser,P.F., Hess,B., EU-Zivilprocessrecht, München, 2021, 5. Aufl, C.H. Beck Verlag, pp 421-460.
  12. Simaitis, R., Vébraité, V., Markeviciuté,M., (2022), European Small Claim Procedure in the Realm of other European Proceeedings, Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal (1), pp. 123-136, https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/685.
  13. Streatmans, G., Vereecken, J. (2024). Towards a New Balance Between Private and Public Enforcement of EU Consumer Law, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 32, Issue, pp 41-80. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2024005.
  14. Varga, I., (2015) Kommentar EG-BagatellVO in Raucher, T. (Hrsg) Europäisches Zivilprozess-und Kolisionsrecht EUZPR/EuIPR, Kommentar, Band II, Köln, 2015, 4. Aufl., Verlag Dr Otto Schmidt KG, pp 403-551.

Update cookies preferences