Published 2025-05-06
Keywords
- ESCP Regulation,
- on-line dispute resolution platforms,
- digitalization,
- artificial intelligence,
- administration of justice
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Fulvio M. Palombino, Eloisa M.B. Bellucci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
After 17 years since its entry into force, the ESCP Regulation is still scarcely applied by national courts of EU Member States. Against this backdrop, the objective of this paper is evaluating whether digitalizing the procedure could save it from obsolescence. In this regard, it will be contended that the automation of the ESCP would not provide solutions to topical problems affecting the system, such as its limited integration in domestic legal systems and its full reliance on the Member States’ existing internal organization of the judiciary.
Downloads
References
- Abignente, I., Giacalone, M. & Tuccillo, R. (2020), SCAN Deliverable 4.1. Harmonised Guidelines. https://www.scanproject.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2021/05/D4.1_HARMONISED_GUIDELINES.pdf.
- Abignente, I, Rolando, F. & Ruggieri, P.C. (2021). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in Italy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 10(1), 40-44.
- Bertoli, P. (2008). Verso un diritto processuale civile comunitario uniforme: l’ingiunzione europea di pagamento e le controversie di modesta entità. Rivista di Diritto Internazionale Privato e Processuale, 44(2), 395-428.
- Cortés, P. (2016). The New Landscape of Consumer Redress. The European Directive on Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution. In Cortés, P. (Ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (17-40). Oxford University Press.
- Cortés, P. & Ma?ko, R. (2016). Developments in European Civil Procedures. In Cortés, P. (Ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (41-64). Oxford University Press.
- de Graaf, T. & Veldt, G. (2022). The AI Act and Its Impact on Product Safety, Contracts and Liability. European Review of Private Law, 30(5), 803-834.
- Donoghue, J. (2017). The Rise of Digital Justice: Courtroom Technology, Public Participation and Access to Justice. The Modern Law Review, 80(6), 995-1025.
- Ebers, M., Hoch, V.R.S., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H. & Steinrötter, B. (2021). The European Commission’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—a critical assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS). J, 4(4), 589-603.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers, Gascón Inchausti, M., Hess, B., Cuniberti, G. (2017). An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgments and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer law: strand 1: mutual trust and free circulation of judgments. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/38491.
- Ho-Dac, M. (2024). Digitalisation of Justice Systems in the European Union: Towards a European Judicial Area 2.0. The EAPIL blog. https://eapil.org/2024/02/06/digitalisation-of-justice-systems-in-the-european-union-towards-a-european-judicial-area-2-0/.
- Gale, M. & Zajc, K. (2020). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in Slovenia. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 9(6), 267-270.
- Giacalone, M. & Sajedeh Salehi, S. (2022). Small claims and the pursuit of (digital) justice: a tiered online dispute resolution perspective. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, 1, 181-213.
- Hinrichs, O. & Thevis, J. (2021). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in Germany. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 10(2), 75-79.
- Kerr, I. & Mathen, C. (2014). Chief Justice John Roberts is a Robot. University of Ottawa Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3395885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3395885.
- Kramer, X.E. (2011). Small claim, simple recovery? The European small claims procedure and its implementation in the member states. ERA Forum, 12, 119-133.
- Langford, M. (2020). Taming the Digital Leviathan: Automated Decision-Making and International Human Rights. American Journal of International Law Unbound, 114, 141-146.
- Leandro, A. (2009). Il procedimento europeo per le controversie di modesta entità. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 92(1), 65-93.
- Mesquita, L.V. & Marques Cebola, C., (2022). European Small Claims Procedure: An Effective Process? A Proposal for an Online Platform. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(2), 7-21.
- Molbæk-Steensig, H. & Quemy, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Fair Trial Rights. In Quintavalla, A. & Temperman, J. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights (265-280). Oxford University Press.
- Nikolinakos, N.T. (2023). EU Policy and Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Related Technologies - The AI Act. Springer.
- Palao Moreno, G. (2016). Cross- border Consumer Redress after the ADR Directive and the ODR Regulation. In Cortés, P. (Ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (393-406). Oxford University Press.
- Papagianneas, S. & Junius, N. (2023). Fairness and justice through automation in China’s smart courts. Computer Law & Security Review, 51, 1-13.
- Pasquale, F. (2019). A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation. The George Washington Law Review, 87(1), 1-55.
- Pehlivan, C.N. (2024). The EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: An Introduction. Global Privacy Law Review, 5(1), 31-42.
- Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2006). Balancing the Scales: The Ford-Firestone Case, the Internet, and the Future Dispute Resolution Landscape, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 1-54.
- Reiling, A.D. (2020). Courts and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 1-10.
- Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V. & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI and Society, 36(1), 59-77.
- Sajedeh Salehi, S. & Giacalone, M., (2021). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in Belgium. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 10(2), 80-84.
- Schäferling, S. (2023). Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights. Springer.
- Schmitz, A.J. (2019). Expanding Access to Remedies through E-Court Initiatives. Buffalo Law Review, 67(1), 89-164.
- Simaitis, R., Vebraite, V. & Markeviciute, M. (2020). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in Lithuania. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 9(6), 267-270.
- Sourdin, T. & Cornes, R (2018). Do Judges Need to be Human? The Implications of Technology for Responsive Judging. In Sourdin, T. & Zariski, A. (Eds.), The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives (87-121). Springer.
- Sourdin, T. (2021). Judges, Technology and Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- van Gelder, E. (2019). The EU Approach to Consumer ODR. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 6(2), 219-226.
- Veersalu, K. & Hoffmann, T. (2023). Automation Within a Novel Platform for the European Small Claims Procedure. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(2), 152-176.
- Volokh, E. (2019). Chief Justice Robots. Duke Law Journal, 68(6), 1135-1192.
- Winkler, M. & Baquero, P.M. (2021). The Implementation of the European Small Claims Procedure in France. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 10(1), 36-40.
- Yuan, S. (2019). AI-assisted sentencing speeds up cases in judicial system. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2019-04/18/content_37459601.htm.
- Zekos, G.I. (2022). Advanced Artificial Intelligence and Robo-Justice. Springer.