Núm. 1 (2025): Small claims
Artículos

Effective National Approaches to Small Claims Procedures: Digital Enforcement in Slovenia

Daša Tičar
University of Ljubljana
Lana K. Gotvan
University of Ljubljana
Katarina Zajc
University of Ljubljana

Publicado 2025-05-06

Palabras clave

  • european small claims procedure,
  • digital enforcement,
  • Slovenia,
  • digitalisation,
  • judicial efficiency

Cómo citar

Tičar, D., Gotvan, L. K., & Zajc, K. (2025). Effective National Approaches to Small Claims Procedures: Digital Enforcement in Slovenia. Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, (1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2910

Resumen

This paper reviews effective practices in small claims dispute resolution, namely digital enforcement of small claims in the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter, Slovenia). This paper first presents the options available to a party with a small claim in Slovenia, including the national small claims procedure and the European small claims procedure, which coexist. Second, this paper outlines how digital enforcement in Slovenia further enhances the efficiency of small claims procedures and argues that it is one of the key tools for lowering the cost of enforcing a party’s rights. We discuss the positive and negative effects of digital enforcement and situate it within the broader system of legal options available to a party with a small claim. Third, we look at how digital tools could enhance the European small claims procedure and argue that the SCAN-II platform represents an important advance in simplifying and digitalising enforcement procedures.

 

The main purpose of small claims procedures is to minimise the cost and length of the proceedings as the costs of litigating such small claims often exceed the value of the dispute. Hence, parties are hesitant to initiate regular proceedings and protect their rights. In Slovenia, the mechanism of digital enforcement helps alleviate that risk. Digital enforcement is used for the recovery of a sum of money based on a trustworthy document and thus, there is no need for the party to file a suit first and enforce the judgment later on. The enforcement procedure can be initiated solely on the basis of a trustworthy document, which streamlines and expedites debt recovery. Thus, digital enforcement crucially supports parties in enforcing their rights, especially in cases where the stakes of the dispute are low.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. 2010 edition of the Crystal Scales of Justice. (n.d.). European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Retrieved 27 April 2024, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/events/crystal-scales-of-justice-prize/2010
  2. Automated system for enforcement of authentic documents (COVL) SLOVENIA. (2010). Crystal Scales of Justice.
  3. Betteto, N. (2010). Komentar k 442. ?lenu ZPP. In L. Ude & A. Gali? (Eds.), Pravdni postopek, 3. Knjiga. Uradni list Republike Slovenije, GV Založba.
  4. Bradway, J. S. (1940). Benefits, Functions, and Procedures of Small-Claims Courts. Monthly Labor Review, 50(1), 16–27.
  5. Cigrovski, J. (2010, September 13). E-izvršba. IUS-INFO. https://www.iusinfo.si/medijsko-sredisce/v-srediscu/58637?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiAlcyuBhBnEiwAOGZ2S2UyaS5c83UlpYDr_FCfGiBjkNV_5LRnlisAtiPTMpVIKLHf24X00BoCWKIQAvD_BwE
  6. Council of Europe. (2019, October 25). The CEPEJ awards the Crystal Scales of Justice Prize to the Supreme Court of Slovenia. https://search.coe.int/directorate_of_communications/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680988379
  7. EU Državljan. (n.d.). Evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti. Retrieved 24 April 2024, from https://eu-drzavljan.si/storitve/evropski-postopek-v-sporih-majhne-vrednosti
  8. European Commission. (n.d.). European Small Claims—Application. Retrieved 24 April 2024, from https://www.era-comm.eu/EU_Civil_Justice_Training_Modules/kiosk/courses/Small_Claims_Procedure/module_1/forms_2.html
  9. European Commission. (2012). Special Eurobarometer 395. 2013. European Small Claims Procedure. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_395_en.pdf
  10. European Commission, Directorate General for Justice. (2013). Practice guide for the application of the European small claims procedure: Under regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European small claims procedure. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/37883
  11. European Economic and Social Committee. (2019). Digitalisation: Challenges for Europe. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2864/878400
  12. European e-Justice Portal—How to enforce a court decision. (2020, November 12). https://e-justice.europa.eu/52/EN/how_to_enforce_a_court_decision?SLOVENIA&init=true&member=1
  13. European e-Justice Portal—Small claims forms. (2023, January 27). https://e-justice.europa.eu/177/en/small_claims_forms?init=true
  14. European Investment Bank. (2023). Digitalisation in Europe. https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20230112_digitalisation_in_europe_2022_2023_en.pdf
  15. European Small Claims procedure: Cost and process. (2023, July 17). Your Europe. https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/dealing-with-customers/solving-disputes/european-small-claims-procedure/index_en.htm
  16. Gali?, A. (2004). Arbitraža in izvršba na podlagi verodostojne listine. Pravna Praksa, 23(3/4), 4–6.
  17. Gali?, A. (2010). Slovenia—National Report—World Arbitration Reporter—2nd Edition. https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/slovenia-national-report-world-arbitration-reporter-war-2nd-edition
  18. Gali?, A. (2012). Pla?ilni nalog in izvršba na podlagi verodostojne listine ter arbitraža. Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav, 72, 49-78,.
  19. Harley, G., & Said, A. (2017). Fast-Tracking the Resolution of Minor Disputes. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/26100
  20. Horjak, T. (2012). PREDNOSTI IN SLABOSTI ELEKTRONSKEGA VLAGANJA IZVRŠB [Thesis, University of Maribor, Faculty of Law]. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=39269
  21. Huan, Z. (2012). Enlightenment of American Small Claim Procedure. Journal of Tangshan Vocational & Technical College. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Enlightenment-of-American-Small-Claim-Procedure-Huan/5a27b74d2c8c28a5db2cd43df49abe5e394b1fdf
  22. Jokubauskas, R., & ?wierczy?ski, M. (2023). Digitalisation of Enforcement Proceedings. Utrecht Law Review, 19(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.819
  23. Kramberger Škerl, J. (2015). Obrazložitev sodbe in pritožba v sporu majhne vrednosti. In M. Ahtik (Ed.), Pravo in politika sodobnega varstva potrošnikov (pp. 283-303,). IUS Software, GV založba : Inštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/si/sl/bib/14656849
  24. Kveder, P. (2017). Spor majhne vrednosti [Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta]. https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=95423
  25. Pavlina, U. (2013). Materialno procesno vodstvo v sporih majhne vrednosti. Pravna Praksa, 32(7/8), 13–14.
  26. Petkova, S., & Senderayi, R. G. (2021). Two for one: How Leveraging Small Claims Proceedings Can Improve Judicial Efficiency and Access to Justice. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/487041607706210590/pdf/Two-For-One-How-Leveraging-Small-Claims-Procedures-Can-Improve-Judicial-Efficiency-and-Access-to-Justice.pdf (21
  27. Rong, S. (2011). The Value of Small Claim Lawsuit. Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Value-of-Small-Claim-Lawsuit-Rong/cd9b89757736e490cf1b41e9a42ece0cec746422
  28. SCAN II. (n.d.). Retrieved 24 April 2024, from https://scan.khramov.dev/home
  29. Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia. (2010). Navodila za registracijo kvalificiranega uporabnika. https://evlozisce.sodisce.si/dokumenti/CIF_-_navodila_uporabniki_20100917.pdf
  30. Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia. (2019, October 25). Projekt Izboljšanje kakovosti sodstva prejel nagrado Kristalna tehtnica. https://www.sodisce.si/vsrs/objave/2020020313331573
  31. Tekavc, J. (2008). (Ne)zakonitost elektronske izvršbe. Pravna Praksa, 27(47), V–VIII.
  32. Teršek, A. (2015, April 5). Neznosna ravnodušnost in škodljivost pravne ignorance (18): Izvršba; po-brigaj se zase, a koga to res-briga. IUS-INFO. https://www.iusinfo.si/medijsko-sredisce/kolumne/141650
  33. Ude, L. (2002). Civilno procesno pravo. Uradni list Republike Slovenije. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/si/sl/bib/120020736
  34. Uzela?, A. (2010). Privatization of Enforcement Services – A Step Forward for Countries in Transition. In C. H. van Rhee & A. Uzela? (Eds.), Enforcement and enforceability: Tradition and reform. Intersentia [u.a.].
  35. Vukojevi?, D. (2021, February 18). Elektronska izvršba – poenostavljen postopek izterjave dolga. SPOT svetovanje JV Slovenija. https://spotjvslo.si/clanek/elektronska-izvrsba-poenostavljen-postopek-izterjave-dolga
  36. Zakonodaja v angleš?ini. (2024). https://pisrs.si/aktualno/zakonodaja-v-anglescini

Update cookies preferences