Núm. 1 (2025): Small claims
Artículos

Judicial Powers of Initiative Under the European Small Claims Procedure

PDF (English) HTML (English)
  • Davide Turroni
Davide Turroni
University of Torino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2915

Publicado 2025-05-06

Palabras clave

  • small claims procedure,
  • european small claims procedure regulation,
  • judicial powers,
  • ex officio powers

Cómo citar

Turroni, D. (2025). Judicial Powers of Initiative Under the European Small Claims Procedure. Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, (1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2915

Derechos de autor 2025 Davide Turroni

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Resumen

 European Small Claims Procedure Regulation contains a sparse cluster of provisions, whereby the court is conferred specific tasks implying various degrees of power to act of its own motion. Starting from the assumption that a comparatively high level of ex officio powers helps small claim procedures being more effective, this contribute highlights some relevant nodes of ESCP procedure and the extent therein of judicial powers of initiative.

PDF (English) HTML (English)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Steele, E.H. (1981). The Historical Context of Small Claims Courts. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, pp. 295–376.
  2. Freda, D. (2016). Il mito ricorrente del giudice di pace: dal justice of the peace inglese al conciliatore post-unitario. Rivista di diritto civile, pp. 1292–1305.
  3. Huber, S. (2021). The Reform of the European Small Claims Procedure. Foreign Body or Puzzle Piece within the System of European Civil Procedure? In J. von Hein & T. Kruger (Eds.). Informed Choice in Cross-Border Enforcement (pp. 87–102). Intersentia.
  4. Nieva Fenoll, J. (2022). Online Dispute Resolution for Small Claims: Is this the Only Realistic Solution? Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, pp. 25–36.
  5. Nieva Fenoll, J. (2019). I poteri d’ufficio del giudice nazionale europeo. Rivista di Diritto Processuale Civile, pp. 1223–1240.
  6. Nieva Fenoll, J. (2014). La cattiva reputazione del principio inquisitorio. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, pp. 943–970.
  7. On?anu, E.A. (2017). Cross-Border Debt Recovery in the EU. Intersentia.
  8. Simaitis, R, V?brait?, V. & Markevi?i?t?, M. (2022). European Small Claims Procedure in the Realm of the Other European Proceedings. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, pp. 123–136.
  9. Stürner, R. (2010). Parteiherrschaft versus Richtermacht – Materielle Prozessleitung und Sachverhaltsaufklärung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Verhandlungsmaxime und Effizienz. Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess, pp. 147-162.
  10. Taruffo, M. (2012). La prova nel processo civile, Giuffrè.
  11. Turroni, D. (2022). Oral Hearing Management under E.S.C.P. Regulation. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, pp. 137–160.
  12. Turroni, D. (2024), Party Disposition and Ex Officio Powers in the Taking of Evidence. How to Make Mutual Cooperation Work. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, pp. 1–21.
  13. ELI/UNIDROIT Model European Rules of Civil Procedure 2020, in https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu.
  14. Stadler, A., Smith, V. & Gascón Inchhausti, F. (Eds.) (2023). European Rules of Civil Procedure. A Commentary on the ELI/UNIDROIT Model Rules. Edward Elgar.

Update cookies preferences