N. 1 (2025): Small claims
Artículos

The European Small Claims Procedure and the future of EU-wide procedural instruments

PDF (English) HTML (English)
  • Nicolas Kyriakides
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2908

Pubblicato 2025-04-25

Parole chiave

  • EU small claims,
  • domestic small claims,
  • EU civil procedure,
  • regulation No. 861/2007,
  • expansion

Come citare

Kyriakides, N. (2025). The European Small Claims Procedure and the future of EU-wide procedural instruments. Rivista Italo-Spagnola Di Diritto Processuale, (1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2908

Copyright (c) 2025 Nicolas Kyriakides

Creative Commons License

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.

Abstract

Recent data shows that multiple EU Member States do not offer a simplified, effective, and harmonized procedure for domestic small claims. This data also shows that the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) and other European procedural instruments are not being widely used by litigants in Member States. In light of these developments, this paper argues that the EU legislature should extend the ESCP to domestic small claims in all Member States in addition to cross-boarder small claims. This expansion will have several advantages, including the protection of litigants’ access to justice, the harmonisation of small claims procedure across the EU, and the increased popularity of the ESCP amongst legal professionals. The paper also argues that extending the ESCP to domestic claims is a balanced and limited solution, and it does not violate the procedural autonomy of Member States, nor the fundamental principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.

PDF (English) HTML (English)

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Baghrizabehi, D., & Fer?i?, A. (2023). Private Enforcement of EU State Aid Rules: Is There Any Room for National Procedural Autonomy Left?. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 73(4), 663-691. https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.02
  2. Bobek, M. (2012). Why There Is No Principle of Procedural Autonomy of the Member States. In B. De Witte, & H. W. Micklitz (Eds.), The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States (pp. 305-323). Intersentia. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1614922
  3. Bonelli, M. (2022). Article 47 of the Charter, Effective Judicial Protection and the (Procedural) Autonomy of the Member States. In M. Bonelli, M. Eliantonio, & G. Gentile (Eds.), Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protection (pp. 81-98). Hart Publishing.
  4. Galetta, D. U., Procedural Autonomy of EU Member States: Paradise Lost?: A Study on the “Functionalized Procedural Competence” of EU Member States (Springer, 2010) at 16-17, 121-122.
  5. Giacalone, M., Abignente, I., & Salehi, S. S. (2021). Small in value, important in essence: lessons learnt from a decade of implementing the European Small Claims Procedure in Italy and Belgium. Journal of Private International Law, 17(2), 308-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2021.1953733
  6. Harley, G., & Said, A. (2017). Fast-Tracking the Resolution of Minor Disputes: Experience from EU Member States. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/670181487131729316/Fast-tracking-the-resolution-of-minor-disputes-experience-from-EU-Member-States
  7. Inchausti, F. G. (2020). Have the EU Regulations on Judicial Cooperation Fostered Harmonisation of National Procedures?. In F. G. Inchausti, & B. Hess (Eds.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure: Coordination or Harmonisation? (pp. 91-110). Intersentia.
  8. Kakouris, M. C. (1997). Do the Member States Possess Judicial Procedural ‘autonomy’. Common Market Law Review, 34(6), 1389-1412.
  9. Kramer, X. E. (2011). Small Claim, Simple Recovery? The European Small Claims Procedure and Its Implementation in the Member States. ERA Forum: Journal of European Law, 1, 119-134. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1976292
  10. Kramer, X. E. (2019). Strengthening Civil Justice Cooperation: The Quest for Model Rules and Common Minimum Standards of Civil Procedure in Europe. In M. A. Rodrigues, & H. Zaneti (Eds.), Coleção Grandes Temas do Novo CPC - v.13 - Cooperação Internacional (pp. 591-607). Editora Juspodivm.
  11. Krans, B., & Nylund, A. (2020). Procedural Autonomy Across Europe. Intersentia.
  12. Law, S., & Nowak, J. T. (2020). Procedural Harmonisation by the European Court of Justice: Procedural Autonomy and the Member States’ Perspective. In F. G. Inchausti (Ed.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure (pp. 16-68). Intersentia.
  13. Mellone, M. (2014). Legal Interoperability in Europe: An Assessment of the European Payment Order and the European Small Claims Procedure. In F. Contini, & G. Lanzara (Eds.), The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice (pp. 245-264). Springer.
  14. Mesquita, L. V., & Cebola, C. M. (2022). European Small Claims Procedure: An Effective Process?. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(14), 1-17. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3960
  15. On?anu, E. A. (2017). Incorporating European Uniform Procedures into National Procedural Systems and Practice: Best Practices a Solution for Harmonious Application. In B. Hess, & X. E. Kramer (Eds.), From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure (pp. 459-480). Nomos.
  16. Santaló Goris, C. (2022). A Boost in the Number of European Small Claims Procedures before Spanish Courts: A Collateral Effect of the Massive Number of Applications for European Payment Orders? Conflict of Laws. https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000C-A44C-6
  17. Skouris, V. (2009). The Principle of Procedural Autonomy and the Duty of Loyal Cooperation of National Judges under Article 10 EC. In M. Andenas, & D. Fairgrieve (Eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (pp. 493-508). Oxford University Press.
  18. Storskrubb, E. (2011). Civil Justice: A Newcomer and an Unstoppable Wave. In P. Craig, & G. De Búrca (Eds.), The Evolution of European Law (pp. 299-322). Oxford University Press.
  19. Storskrubb, E. (2018). Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered. Oxford University Press.
  20. Van Cleynenbreugel, P. (2016). Embedding Procedural Autonomy: The Directive and National Procedural Rules. In M. Bergström, M. Iacovides, & M. Strand (Eds.), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation: The New Directive and Beyond (pp. 99-119). Hart Publishing.
  21. Vernadaki, Z. (2013). Civil Procedure Harmonization in the EU: Unravelling the Policy Considerations. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 19(2), 297?312. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v9i2.425

Update cookies preferences