Published 2026-04-27
Keywords
- notary service,
- artificial intelligence,
- digitalization,
- implementation
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Ekaterine Shengelia, Irakli Leonidze

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In the modern world, technological innovation is advancing at an unprecedented pace and artificial intelligence (AI) stands out as a transformative set of technologies with profound social and economic implications. AI is not a single invention, but a cluster of rapidly developing tools that increasingly affect all areas of professional and social life. Its functional nature - fast, widely accessible and highly adaptable - suggests that its impact on legal relations will only intensify over time, whether in routine tasks or complex processes.
The aim of this research is to analyze the potential and challenges of integrating AI into the Latin-based notary system. While several European notary chambers have already adopted new applications - such as chatbots for client communication, automated drafting tools, data-verification systems, videoconferencing platforms and electronic notarial acts - Georgia remains in the early stages of technological adaptation. This study seeks to identify best practices from the European experience and propose strategies to ensure that Georgian notaries can deliver services that are efficient, secure and user-oriented.
Methodologically, the research employs a doctrinal and comparative approach. Legislative frameworks, professional guidelines and existing technological infrastructures in European notary systems are examined, alongside an evaluation of risks linked to automation, data protection and reliability. The analysis is complemented by practical assessments of how such technologies could be introduced, considering both institutional capacity and public trust. The expected contribution of this research is twofold. First, it provides a systematic overview of how innovative services can be responsibly implemented in the Latin-based notary systems. Second, it highlights the risks of technological integration and offers recommendations to mitigate them.
The study underscores that the modernization of the notarial profession is inseparable from technological development and is vital for maintaining the relevance, accessibility and credibility of notarial services in the digital age. Notaries should not be replaced by AI, it must be guided by notaries – We should overcome this fear together.
Downloads
References
- Aksharha, G. J., Shruthi, I., & Rubikka, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the legal profession.International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, 6(4).
- Chiarini, A., & Forte, A. (2016).Excellence in notary services through ISO 9001 certification: An investigation from Italy.
- Council of Europe. (2024).Framework convention on artificial intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS No. 225).
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2018).Specific study of the CEPEJ on the legal professions: Notaries.
- European Data Protection Board. (2024).EDPB opinion on AI models: GDPR principles support responsible AI. https://edpb.europa.eu
- European Data Protection Board. (2025).Certification, blockchain and AI: EDPB adopts new documents at its latest plenary session.
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024).Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).Official Journal of the European Union.
- Geimer, R. (2001). The circulation of notarial acts and their effect in law. InXXIII International Congress of Latin Notaries: Report of the German delegation.
- Hall, E. G. (2015).The common law and civil law notary in the European Union: A shared heritage and an influential future.
- International Bar Association, & Center for AI and Digital Policy. (2024, September).The future is now: Artificial intelligence and the legal profession.
- Itsme®. (2025, March 31).Royal Dutch Association of civil-law notaries and itsme® collaborate for digital ID and e-signatures.
- Jackowski, M., & Araszkiewicz, M. (Eds.). (2024).First global report on the state of artificial intelligence in legal practice.
- Jeep, J. (2019). Notary disrupted – Legal tech und der Rechtsstaat: Chancen und Risiken der KI für den Rechtsstaat im Allgemeinen und den Notarberuf im Besonderen.Legal Tech.
- Malavet, P. A. (1996). Counsel for the situation: The Latin notary, a historical and comparative model.Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 19.
- Parsova, V., Gurskiene, V., & Kaing, M. (2012).Real property cadastre in Baltic countries.
- Rinne, T. (2017).A guide to corporate forms for doing business in Germany.
- Ruggeri, L., Kunda, I., & Winkler, S. (Eds.). (2019).Family property and succession in EU member states: National reports on the collected data. European Commission.
- Shengelia, E., & Leonidze, I. (2024). Notary electronic registry and data security.Journal of Personal Data Protection Law, 1.
- Verboven, F., & Yontcheva, B. (2022).Private monopoly and restricted entry: Evidence from the notary profession.
- Walree, T. F., Reijneveld, M. D., Wolters, P. T. J., & Roes, J. S. L. A. W. B. (2023).AI in the notarial profession: An exploration of the opportunities, risks, and legal conditions of the development and use of AI in the notarial profession [External research report].
- Zeng, R. (2012). Real estate operations and notary system in civil law legal systems.US-China Law Review, 9.